header-logo header-logo

Delay & Covid: the court’s power to reduce sentence

01 October 2021 / Andrew Morris
Issue: 7950 / Categories: Features , Covid-19 , Criminal
printer mail-detail
59349
Andrew Morris considers the impact of delays on both charge & trial on sentencing
  • Delay between arrest and charge and charge and trial. Effect of delay on sentence and whether this should afford a reduction to the overall tariff.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a dramatic effect on the business of the criminal courts, in particular the Crown Court’s capacity to carry on with its main business, which is the administration of jury trials. By their very nature, the trial process in the Crown Court involves the movement of ‘jury pools’ around the Crown Court building, and jurors sitting in close proximity to each other and deliberating in small rooms or spaces.

Those within the profession as advocates in the Crown and magistrate’s courts have been well aware of the backlogs that already existed before the pandemic. The latest figures released by the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) are in excess of 50,000 cases, much of which was already an issue due to the reduction in sitting

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll