header-logo header-logo

Defamation & ‘serious harm’ post Lachaux

11 July 2019 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7848 / Categories: Features , Defamation
printer mail-detail

Nicholas Dobson applauds the elegance of the judgment in Lachaux, which gives a much clearer basis for future consideration of potentially defamatory material

  • Section 1 of the Defamation Act 2013 raises the common law threshold of seriousness and requires its application to be determined by reference to actual facts and not merely to the meaning of material words.

Reputation has always been a precious commodity. Shakespeare knew this. So in Richard II, Mowbray, feeling ‘pierced to the soul with slander’s venomed spear’ pleaded passionately that ‘The purest treasure mortal times afford/Is spotless reputation.’ And Cassio in Othello mourned to evil Iago: ‘Reputation, reputation, reputation! O, I have lost my reputation, I have lost the immortal part of myself.’

So the law long recognised the need to protect reputation from unjustified assault. As Lord Sumption indicated, opening his elegant Supreme Court judgment on 12 June 2019 in Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd and another [2019] UKSC 27, [2019] All ER (D) 42 (Jun): ‘The tort of defamation is an ancient construct

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll