header-logo header-logo

21 February 2024
Issue: 8060 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Decline and fall of legal aid

Up to 90% of the population are unable to access legal aid in certain areas, a series of interactive maps published by the Law Society has revealed

The maps, updated this week, are compiled from the Legal Aid Agency’s directory of legal aid providers. They show the availability of legal aid providers in housing, welfare, education, community care and immigration practice areas across different parts of the country. Availability is particularly sparse in the South West, North, North East and East, in Wales, and in the South and South East outside of London.

According to figures gathered by the Law Society, 53 million people (90%) across England and Wales do not have access to a local education legal aid provider, and 50 million people (85%) have no access to a local welfare legal aid provider.

Some 42 million people (71%) have no access to a local community care legal aid provider, and more than 37 million people (63%) do not have access to a local immigration and asylum legal aid provider.

In the area of housing, 26 million people (44%) can’t access a legal aid provider.

Law Society president Nick Emmerson said: ‘In the middle of a cost-of-living crisis, this is a serious concern.

‘It would not take a huge sum of money in terms of overall public expenditure to tackle the crisis and the savings in other areas from solving people’s problems early would more than offset the cost.’

Law Society-commissioned research by Frontier Economics found 100% of housing legal aid providers are loss-making—published last week in the Law Society’s interim report, ‘Research on the sustainability of civil legal aid’. The full report, and the interactive maps, have been submitted to the Ministry of Justice’s call for evidence to its review of civil legal aid, which closed this week.

Issue: 8060 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll