header-logo header-logo

Deal or no deal?

22 November 2018 / David Greene
Issue: 7818 / Categories: Opinion , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Whether or not the latest Withdrawal Agreement succeeds, Brexit is still likely to launch a thousand writs, says David Greene

The latest version of the draft Withdrawal Agreement lies before us, but we are no nearer to concluding what the outcome of all the political events will be as we head towards the EU exit. Mine is not to speculate, but to contemplate the two main possible outcomes and the effect on civil justice: a departure with no deal, or a departure largely on the basis of the draft Withdrawal Agreement.

Status update

The Withdrawal Agreement is of course simply a preliminary agreement dealing with the immediate consequences of departure next March. It proposes in the main a transition period until the end of 2020 while the longer-term relationship is negotiated. The agreement provides that the period may be extended, by the newly created Joint Committee, as long as the extension is agreed by July 2020. It might thus be better termed a Transition Agreement; that was how it appeared in its original

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll