header-logo header-logo

Data sharing review

18 September 2013
Issue: 7576 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Law Commission launches privacy & security review

The Law Commission has launched a review of privacy and security laws where public bodies share private information on individuals.

In a consultation published last week, Sharing data between public bodies, the Commission questions whether the “significant obstacles” to data sharing between public bodies are necessary. 

The laws on data-sharing are found in the data Protection Act 1998 as well as in various parts of contract, employment, EU law, common law and professional regulations. The Commission asks whether the law “unduly restricts data sharing”, is “too complex”, and whether a lack of clarity in the law has led public bodies to develop a secretive culture that inhibits data sharing.

The Commission closes its consultation on 16 December 2013, and will present its findings in the spring.

Tom Morrison, commercial and IP partner at Rollits, says: “Key to all of this in my view is transparency and, where appropriate, consent. The individual must, however, have a very clear understanding as to what they are consenting to, and the information provided must be intelligible and not in technocratic speak.

“I do not believe that it is necessarily the case that the law puts in place unnecessary obstacles. Used properly, the Data Protection Act can, for example, be used to regulate and facilitate sharing of information. The DPA is there not to block sharing of information, but to help set the ground rules for data sharing.”

However, he warned that there was always a danger of “mission creep” with public bodies sharing more information than necessary.

Issue: 7576 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll