header-logo header-logo

01 July 2021
Issue: 7939 / Categories: Legal News , Data protection
printer mail-detail

Data protection adequacy rating welcomed

Lawyers have welcomed the European Commission’s decision that UK data protection standards are ‘adequate’―however, weakening standards could lead to immediate revocation
The decision means digital information can continue to flow between the UK and European Economic Area (EEA) without additional safeguards being introduced.

Under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the European Commission determines whether third countries provide adequate protection for personal data. The Trade and Cooperation Agreement provided a bridging mechanism, which was due to end on 30 June 2021.

Kate Brimsted, partner at Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner, said: ‘This formal recognition of the adequacy of the UK’s data protection laws is a highly significant step. 

‘It will save EU businesses with UK-bound data flows―as well as their UK business partners―a considerable amount of red tape. The decision was not a forgone conclusion and objections and concerns were raised by the European Parliament during the process.’

However, she highlighted the fact the decision came with a built-in expiry date of four years.

‘As well as this, if the UK’s data policy innovations go too far for the European Commission’s liking, there is the ability to revoke the decision immediately,’ she said.

‘While this comes as a relief (if not a surprise), the UK will have to box clever when it comes to its post-Brexit liberalisation of laws, and its digital strategy-setting. The UK government’s TIGRR [Taskforce on Innovation, Growth and Regulatory Reform] report last month proposed replacing the GDPR with a “more proportionate framework”, something which sounds exactly the kind of move likely to endanger the UK’s adequacy decision, if taken up.’

Had the European Commission decision gone the other way, all those processing personal data would have been required to put in place appropriate safeguards or rely on exemptions in data protection law.

The Law Society, which has been urging members to hope for the best but prepare for the worst, welcomed the news but recommended members regularly review their contingency planning.

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said: ‘Though adopted, adequacy decisions are time-limited, subject to review and may even be challenged in the future especially if the UK diverges from EU regulation.’

Issue: 7939 / Categories: Legal News , Data protection
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll