header-logo header-logo

Data breaches: a personalised response

16 October 2019 / Elizabeth Bardsley
Issue: 7864 / Categories: Features , Insurance / reinsurance , Data protection , Technology
printer mail-detail
Elizabeth Bardsley explains why tailoring response to identity can help data controllers avoid breach claims
  • When a data breach occurs, controllers need to act fast but also consider the identity of the individuals concerned.
  • Appropriate responses may vary. Consider factors such as potential resentment against the controller, employment status and age.

Following a personal data breach, what can data controllers do to limit their exposure to data breach claims? And to what extent should breach response be shaped by the identities of the data subjects themselves?

The rise in data breach claims has been well reported. This is largely a direct result of the GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) giving data subjects a statutory right to claim compensation for non-material damage in addition to material (financial). Claimants can therefore seek awards for inconvenience or distress caused by the loss or unauthorised disclosure of their data; a much lower threshold than earlier data protection law.

This, along with the onerous notification obligations the GDPR places upon data controllers,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll