header-logo header-logo

The dangers of silencing dissent

01 May 2008 / Imran Awan
Issue: 7319 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

The new offence of glorifying terrorism will make Britain less safe, says Imran Awan

The Terrorism Act 2006 (TA 2006) has made the “glorification” of terrorism a criminal offence. The difficulty with this provision is clear—when you outlaw freedom of speech you are violating civil liberties and this will surely result in Britain becoming less safe by silencing dissent.

Swept up in this new anti-terror safety net could be those who protest against dictators such as Zimbabwe's Robert Mugabe. This has in turn created further difficulties in respect of freedom of expression, for example a statement published in a book, newspaper, pamphlet or magazine may be read, either in hard copy or on the Internet, by UK nationals, foreign visitors and people abroad.

Passionate Expression

Under the Act a person's passionate expression might be interpreted as recklessness. If someone is calling for the end of a particular rogue regime it is not particularly relevant whether they are negligent or reckless in the way they do so. Speech offences

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll