header-logo header-logo

03 August 2012 / Hayley Mclorinan
Issue: 7525 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Damage control

Hayley McLorinan tackles the issue of recoverable heads of loss between jurisdictions

Can an English court assess damages using the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 (FAA 1976) when the tortious act resulting in death occurred in Germany? No, said the Court of Appeal in Cox v Ergo Versicherung AG [2012] EWCA Civ 854, [2012] All ER (D) 168 (Jun), Dame Janet Smith dissenting.

The facts

Mrs Cox lived in Germany with her husband, Major Christopher Cox, where he was stationed with HM Forces. They were both UK nationals. In May 2004, Major Cox was killed while riding his bicycle when he was hit by a car. The car driver was a German national with a German registered insurance company. Mrs Cox returned to the UK in 2005.

It was not disputed that liability fell to be determined under German law, or that the matter could be heard in England. The dispute arose as to whether damages could be awarded to Mrs Cox under the English FAA 1976, which affords dependants the ability to claim

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll