header-logo header-logo

24 November 2017
Issue: 7771 / Categories: Features , Data protection , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Cyber fraud: a question of trust

nlj_7771_barclay

Robin Barclay explains why the cyber fraud landscape is on par with the Libor & Forex scandals

Cyber fraud is without doubt the biggest commercial and legal threat now facing businesses and individuals around the world. Attacks are typically carried out in four ways: (i) the corruption or coercion of staff (inside jobs); (ii) the use of malware to hijack a corporate computer network; (iii) the hijacking of computer systems used by third party suppliers; and (iv) ‘phishing’ scams. The risk is interdependent, local and cross-border, commercial, financial and personal to virtually each one of us. Adequate and effective corporate governance and risk management arrangements are thus paramount. This article explores the intersection of English criminal, regulatory and civil liabilities and remedies in connection with cyber fraud and how cyber attacks will inevitably generate financial penalties and litigation matching those of the global Libor and Forex scandals.

Differentiating cyber crime from cyber fraud

Cyber crime is any crime which involves the use and misuse of computers or computer technology. Cyberfraud is specific to fraudulent

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll