header-logo header-logo

18 January 2007
Issue: 7256 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Cut indeterminate sentences, judges told

News

Prison overcrowding will rise unless the soaring number of indeterminate sentences being handed out to dangerous offenders by judges is curbed, the head of the Parole Board warns.

Sir Duncan Nichol, the board chairman, says that within four years the number of criminals in jails in England and Wales with such sentences is expected to reach 12,500. If the life-sentence population is added to this then the total number of prisoners in jail for ‘life’ by 2011 could be almost 20,000.
He says: “The global impact of indeterminate sentences for public protection will be that prison overcrowding will increase and places on offending behaviour courses will be scarce.”

The indeterminate sentence was introduced in April 2005 and is aimed at offenders deemed dangerous and who have been convicted of a crime from a list of 153 that includes wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm, assault to resist arrest, riot, violent disorder and some sex offences.
Those receiving such a sentence are told they must serve a minimum prison term before being considered for release by the board. Around 1,900 of the sentences have been dished out, but many offenders are being told that they will serve minimum terms of less than two years before being considered for release.

Nichol says that such short minimum terms mean that neither the Prison Service nor the board can carry out proper risk assessments.
Indeed, he says, many offenders have been given an 18-month minimum term meaning they are entitled to be considered for release almost as soon as they are jailed.

Issue: 7256 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll