header-logo header-logo

09 February 2024 / Sam Healey
Issue: 8058 / Categories: Features , Profession , Crypto , Cybercrime , Cyber
printer mail-detail

Crypto law: not clear cut?

157343
Sam Healey explores the legal liabilities of crypto platforms in digital transactions
  • Cryptocurrencies present a range of challenges, including jurisdictional issues and identifying wrongdoers and liability.
  • Crypto platforms must comply with anti–money laundering (AML) regulations and be registered with the FCA. But more legal clarity is needed.

In the rapidly evolving world of cryptocurrencies, questions of legality and responsibility are beginning to take centre stage. One of the most prominent among these concerns is the liability of cryptocurrency platforms when investors are scammed or their cryptoassets are stolen.

To shed light on this topic, we must first outline the duties and responsibilities these platforms bear, and explain what rights and avenues for recompense an investor might have in the aftermath of a scam that targets digital assets.

Cryptoasset exchange providers are virtual spaces where users can trade, hold or sell their cryptoassets. They are similar to traditional financial institutions in some aspects, although distinct in operation given the nature of how the business takes place. So the question of liability

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll