header-logo header-logo

22 November 2007 / Tom Epps
Issue: 7298 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Crossing the pond

Tom Epps highlights the increasing Americanisation of UK corporate crime investigations

The ongoing BA/Virgin cartel case sharply brings into focus the strong influence that US law enforcement agencies have imposed on corporate crime investigations in the UK. The influence of the US can be seen in both the investigative methods adopted by law enforcement agencies here, and more obviously in relation to the prospect of extradition to the US for the four former BA directors.

US-STYLE INVESTIGATIONS

Historically, the UK law enforcement agencies have been reluctant to grant immunity against prosecution to those who have admitted offences, even though they are willing to give evidence against others. The UK criminal courts have generally viewed any evidence of an accomplice with scepticism on the basis that they may simply seek to serve their own ends by providing evidence against others.

The US law enforcement agencies have traditionally favoured the practice of using those who admit offences to provide evidence against others in exchange for a substantially reduced sentence or immunity for the whistleblower.

The US

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll