header-logo header-logo

Criminal Litigation

20 April 2010
Issue: 7269 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Remice v Governor of Belmarsh [2007] All ER (D) 439 (Mar)

The defendant was granted conditional bail.  The prosecution appealed to the Crown Court.  The judge refused bail and remanded the defendant in custody but did not set a return date for the defendant to appear again before the magistrates’ court. 

Held:  although ss 128 and 128A of the 1980 Act do not directly bind the Crown Court, a defendant should enjoy no lesser rights than he would have done had the prosecutor’s appeal not supervened. 

In the instant case, the Crown Court ought to have deployed the provisions of s 128A(2) and considered whether the claimant should have been remanded for more than eight days. If question was decided in the affirmative, he should have been allowed to make representations.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll