header-logo header-logo

24 April 2008
Issue: 7318 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Criminal legal aid lawyers face being wiped out

News

Criminal legal aid lawyers face extinction if best value tendering (BVT) is introduced the Law Society says. On average only one new duty solicitor for ever y four criminal legal aid law firms was recruited last year, according to figures obtained under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. The society fears a worsening crisis as legal aid practitioners will become even fewer under BVT.

Law Society president, Andrew Holroyd, says:

 

“We could see a situation where the tendering process is so competitive firms have no choice but to abandon what is one of the most important elements of legal aid practice—the training of the next generation. Even where training is maintained, there will be little in the pot to pay trainees. Numbers of new legal aid lawyers is already dangerously low and with the number of people being arrested and brought to justice rising, the need for these practitioners is high.”

 

Katherine Gibson, president of the society’s Junior Lawyers Division, adds:

“Many young lawyers enter the profession because they want to work in legal aid. These plans will effectively wipe out opportunities to train and work in legal aid and will deter many from entering the profession.” The society says BVT also threatens existing practitioners. Holroyd says: “There is already a battle for talent in the legal profession. Legal aid practices will struggle to hold onto their staff and put in a competitive enough tender at the same time. It could easily be a choice between one or the other.”

Issue: 7318 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll