header-logo header-logo

11 August 2021
Issue: 7945 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Criminal lawyers: ‘We will not do it’

Hundreds of criminal solicitors and barristers are refusing to attend evening and weekend courts

In an open letter, which is rapidly gaining signatories, the lawyers state: ‘The backlog of cases in the criminal courts is not due to the COVID-19 outbreak…It is the inevitable outcome of selling off courts, of reducing judges’ sitting days and of other cost-cutting measures.

‘Not only has the government ignored our warnings, it has overseen the obliteration of our profession. It has been entirely unmoved by respected legal aid firms closing down, duty solicitors and criminal barristers leaving the profession in droves, and pupils and trainees earning less than the Real Living Wage.’

It continues: ‘Now we are told it is “all hands to the pump”…We will not do it. Our goodwill has run dry. The undersigned will not attend a single court listing outside of regular court hours. Not under any circumstances.’

There have not been any weekend criminal court listings. In July, HM Courts and Tribunals proposed introducing extended operating hours to tackle the backlog of cases, in a COVID-19 recovery document. The Lord Chief Justice and Senior President of Tribunals said ‘the Lord Chancellor has agreed that sitting days should be used to their maximum’.

Lord Chancellor, Robert Buckland QC has since confirmed judges will be given the option to open court rooms for longer under ‘temporary operating arrangements’. The measure will be ‘completely at the discretion of independent judges’ and allows a court room to run morning and afternoon lists (9am-1pm and 2pm-6pm) instead of the usual 10am-4pm hours. Judges will be given discretion to hold pre-trial preparation hearings and non-trial work such as pleadings and sentencing online outside of standard working hours (9am-5pm).

Double listings have been piloted in Crown Courts in Liverpool, Cardiff, Kingston-upon-Hull, Portsmouth, Reading, Snaresbrook and Stafford.

Buckland said about 60 Crown Court rooms will reopen by September and 32 Nightingale Court rooms, which deal with non-custodial criminal trials, will have their leases extended to April 2022.

The Criminal Bar Association has said it is opposed to extended operating hours ‘in whatever form it appears’ and ‘is considering all options in terms of its opposition’.

Issue: 7945 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll