header-logo header-logo

Criminal Bar to vote on offer as Law Society poised to advise solicitors to cease work

30 September 2022
Issue: 7997 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Criminal barristers are voting on whether to suspend their strike following an offer from the Lord Chancellor, Brandon Lewis

According to the Ministry of Justice (MoJ), the proposed 15% fee increase for barristers and solicitors will now apply to the ‘vast majority’ of cases currently in the Crown court. Other measures designed to tackle the backlog will be ‘explored’, such as ‘increasing early resolution of cases, reducing the number of ineffective trials and progressing cases between magistrates’ courts and the Crown Court’, the MoJ said, in a statement. In total, an extra £54m will be invested in the criminal Bar and solicitors.

The Criminal Bar Association (CBA) said the government’s offer represents ‘substantial positive movement from government. As a result the offer will be put to a ballot’. However, the CBA tweeted that it was ‘not a good start that the Lord Chancellor has insisted on going ahead with a premature press release’.

Meanwhile, criminal law solicitors are considering withdrawing their labour in protest at the 9% increase offered to them.

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said: ‘Reaching a compromise with criminal barristers but not providing parity for solicitors is short-sighted given it is solicitors who make up the greater part of the criminal defence sector.

‘The independent review the government commissioned made clear solicitors are in an even worse financial situation than their counterparts. Solicitors are the backbone of the criminal justice system, advising their clients from the first moment at the police station, through to passing of a sentence.

‘They are not taking short-term disruptive action. They are simply leaving the profession permanently, in ever greater numbers because the work is not financially viable. And yet the government is currently proposing only a 9% rate increase for solicitors, 40% less than the 15% being offered to barristers, and far less than the bare minimum the Bellamy report concluded was needed for criminal defence solicitors’ firms to remain economically viable.’

Boyce warned: ‘If solicitors do not get parity on the bare minimum 15% recommended by Lord Bellamy, the MoJ will have made it clear that there is no future in criminal defence practice and we will advise our members not to undertake this work. No responsible organisation could truthfully advise otherwise.’

The Law Society was due to hold ‘immediate’ meetings with ministers.

Issue: 7997 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll