header-logo header-logo

02 September 2022
Issue: 7992 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Criminal Bar strike: update

Criminal barristers will down tools indefinitely from next week, in a major escalation of their strike action which has been taking place on alternate weeks

The protest, which has led to an unusual picket line of wigs and gowns, has been ongoing since April, led by the Criminal Bar Association (CBA). The barristers began by operating a ‘no returns’ policy, moving to incrementally increasing strike action in June. They are calling for a 25% increase in legal aid fees for defence work, and demand the government ‘at least’ implement with immediate effect the minimum 15% increase recommended by Sir Christopher Bellamy’s criminal legal aid review (CLAR).

However, the Ministry of Justice has so far promised only a 15% increase in October, which the CBA says would not reach barristers’ pockets until late 2023.

Criminal law solicitors will receive an extra 9% in fees from September.

Last week, nearly 80% of 2,273 CBA members voted to escalate the protest.

Mark Fenhalls QC, Chair of the Bar Council, said: ‘Members of the criminal Bar have been feeling mistreated, undervalued and overwhelmed for a decade or more.

‘Ministers must look again immediately at ways to fund the backlog cases and bring a resolution to this difficult situation.’

CBA chair Jo Sidhu QC said this week the next government should understand ‘we will not be deflected from achieving an outcome that safeguards the future sustainability of our criminal justice system.

‘Faithful to our members, that outcome must include an increase to our fees of 25%, payment for written work, a clear timetable for the implementation of the CLAR recommendations on wasted and special preparation, a second brief fee for section 28 cases, and a pay review body that protects us from the ravages of inflation,’ he said.’

Sidhu will hand over the CBA reins to current vice chair Kirsty Brimelow QC in September. Read Sidhu's final message here.
Issue: 7992 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll