header-logo header-logo

11 April 2018
Issue: 7788 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Criminal Bar steps up action in the face of cuts

Barristers unite in protest against ‘broken’ criminal justice system

The Bar has rallied in support of its criminal law colleagues, as more sets join the action against fee cuts imposed by changes to the advocates’ graduated fee scheme (AGFS).

Criminal law barristers have been rejecting new defence work under the AGFS scheme since 1 April in protest at reforms to the scheme which came into force on the same day.

The Criminal Bar Association (CBA) said a first day of action is currently being planned, and it is setting up circuit sub-committees for its members and will hold another Heads of Chambers meeting to consider ‘both the progress of the action and the possibility of escalation’. It will also meet with solicitor groups to decide how both camps can support each other, and is consulting the Northern Ireland Criminal Bar Association who had a nine-month dispute over legal aid fees in 2015/16, which was resolved by mediation.

Dozens of chambers are now rejecting defence work. A statement from 5KBW said: ‘If we do not take a stand now, we become complicit in permitting our justice system to collapse’. 9 Gough Square said: ‘The underfunding of the criminal justice system has led to a system that is broken; we must act now.’

In a message to barristers this week, Criminal Bar Association chair Angela Rafferty QC said: ‘The dismal state of criminal justice can be improved immensely by relatively modest amounts of investment.

‘The swingeing cuts to the department for the last decades are entirely unjustified and have brought the system to its knees. That is what this action is about.’

Rafferty thanked solicitor colleagues for their support and ‘for the valiant efforts they have made this week when their cases were listed, and they did not have counsel.

‘They too are completely undervalued, mistreated and underfunded.’

An Old Bailey murder trial in which a man, Kema Salum, is accused of murdering his wife was the first to be affected last week when his solicitor told the court she had contacted more than 20 chambers but could not find a barrister prepared to take on the case.

An MoJ spokesperson commented: ‘Any action to disrupt the courts is unacceptable and we are taking all necessary steps to ensure legal representation is available for defendants in criminal cases.

‘We greatly value the work of criminal advocates and will continue to engage with the Bar over their concerns regarding the AGFS scheme. Our reforms are fairer, and replace an archaic scheme under which barristers billed by pages of evidence.’

Chris Dale, founder of the eDisclosure Information Project, reviews the Secret Barrister’s Stories of the Law and How It’s Broken, which describes the state of the criminal justice system, in this week’s NLJ.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll