header-logo header-logo

08 July 2022
Issue: 7986 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Crime does not pay

Criminal courts have ground to a halt for the second week running as criminal barristers continued their strike

Barristers in wigs and gowns brandishing placards with slogans, ‘Crime does not pay’ and ‘Legal aid needs first aid’, made for a distinctive picket line outside the Old Bailey and other Crown Courts. The walkouts, which will increase by one day each week then switch to every other week, have attracted national media attention and high levels of support from outside the profession.

Solicitors are also considering striking―the London Criminal Courts Solicitors Association (LCCSA) was due to close its ballot this week on whether to refuse to cover duty slots at police stations and magistrate’s courts. Many solicitors are already refusing to take on burglary and other low-paid work. LCCSA president Hesham Puri said action could begin as early as next week.

Last week, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) confirmed legislation will be laid in Parliament by 21 July to increase fees paid under the Advocates' Graduated Fee Scheme (AGFS) by 15% from 30 September 2022. It also set out plans to respond to Sir Christopher Bellamy’s criminal legal aid review―which urged an immediate 15% rise in fees as a minimum―in full in the autumn, including ‘details on the longer-term funding and structural graduated fee schemes reform’, which may result in further increases. Criminal law solicitors will receive an extra 9% in fees from September.

However, Jo Sidhu QC, chair, and other executive members of the Criminal Bar Association (CBA), said: ‘Nothing has changed.

‘The Criminal Bar has known the government’s position for months, and resoundingly rejected it when 81% of us voted for days of action. That 15% will only apply to new representation orders from October 2022.

‘Therefore, criminal barristers would not expect to receive the benefit of the 15% increase until late 2023/24 because it would not apply to the 58,000 cases in the backlog.’

The CBA is calling for a 25% increase. It disputes the MoJ’s claim that legal and technical reasons prevent any increase attaching to current cases in the backlog, and has received advice from two QCs that it is lawful to backdate any increase to current representation orders.
Issue: 7986 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll