header-logo header-logo

Crime does not pay

08 July 2022
Issue: 7986 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail
Criminal courts have ground to a halt for the second week running as criminal barristers continued their strike

Barristers in wigs and gowns brandishing placards with slogans, ‘Crime does not pay’ and ‘Legal aid needs first aid’, made for a distinctive picket line outside the Old Bailey and other Crown Courts. The walkouts, which will increase by one day each week then switch to every other week, have attracted national media attention and high levels of support from outside the profession.

Solicitors are also considering striking―the London Criminal Courts Solicitors Association (LCCSA) was due to close its ballot this week on whether to refuse to cover duty slots at police stations and magistrate’s courts. Many solicitors are already refusing to take on burglary and other low-paid work. LCCSA president Hesham Puri said action could begin as early as next week.

Last week, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) confirmed legislation will be laid in Parliament by 21 July to increase fees paid under the Advocates' Graduated Fee Scheme (AGFS) by 15% from 30 September 2022. It also set out plans to respond to Sir Christopher Bellamy’s criminal legal aid review―which urged an immediate 15% rise in fees as a minimum―in full in the autumn, including ‘details on the longer-term funding and structural graduated fee schemes reform’, which may result in further increases. Criminal law solicitors will receive an extra 9% in fees from September.

However, Jo Sidhu QC, chair, and other executive members of the Criminal Bar Association (CBA), said: ‘Nothing has changed.

‘The Criminal Bar has known the government’s position for months, and resoundingly rejected it when 81% of us voted for days of action. That 15% will only apply to new representation orders from October 2022.

‘Therefore, criminal barristers would not expect to receive the benefit of the 15% increase until late 2023/24 because it would not apply to the 58,000 cases in the backlog.’

The CBA is calling for a 25% increase. It disputes the MoJ’s claim that legal and technical reasons prevent any increase attaching to current cases in the backlog, and has received advice from two QCs that it is lawful to backdate any increase to current representation orders.
Issue: 7986 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll