header-logo header-logo

25 January 2023
Issue: 8010 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Crime crisis worsens in crown courts

The number of crown court cases waiting for trial for two years or more has reached a record high, official figures show.

Some 4,893 cases in the third quarter of 2022 had faced this lengthy wait, according to court statistics released last week―the highest number since records began in 2014, and a 69% increase on the same quarter in the previous year. During the same period, which coincided with the strike by criminal barristers, the total number of outstanding cases in the crown court increased from 59,473 at the end of June to 62,766 by the end of September.

Law Society president Lubna Shuja branded the increase in the criminal case backlog ‘unacceptable. An inefficient system is ultimately a drain on public money’. However, she said she believed ‘the system can still be restored with proper investment.

‘A starting point would be to increase criminal defence rates by the minimum 15% recommended by the independent review of criminal legal aid, which the government chose to ignore.’

The backlog has also contributed to a record number of incarcerated defendants―770―who have been in prison for more than two years awaiting trial, according to a Justice Committee report this month, ‘The role of adult custodial remand’.

In 2021, Sir Christopher Bellamy’s independent review of criminal legal aid recommended an immediate 15% rise ‘as a minimum’ in fees for criminal lawyers. Criminal barristers later secured this as part of a wider deal to end its strike action. Solicitors, who are unable to strike due to their contractual obligations, received a lower offer that the Law Society said amounted to about 9% when averaged out.

However, criminal law solicitors could unionise. Last week, the Criminal Law Solicitors Association and London Criminal Courts Solicitors Association announced they had met with unions ‘for very productive talks’ and that the ‘dialogue will continue in the coming weeks’.

Issue: 8010 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll