header-logo header-logo

Crackdown on non-disclosure agreements proposed

03 May 2023
Issue: 8023 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Disciplinary&grievance procedures
printer mail-detail
Legal regulators are considering tougher rules on non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) following a series of controversies in recent years. 

The Legal Services Board (LSB) launched a call for evidence this week on the misuse of NDAs. While it acknowledges the majority of NDAs are used legitimately to protect commercial sensitivities, it wants to explore the scale, extent and nature of misuse, understand why lawyers breach their ethical obligations, and consider ways to improve regulatory controls.

The #MeToo movement raised public awareness of NDA misuse: for example, NDAs were used to cover up the sexual assaults of Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein. As the LSB highlights, NDAs can be used to conceal discrimination, harassment and bullying in a range of sectors, where ‘vulnerable individuals who are the targets of discrimination, harassment or abuse may be asked or coerced through an imbalance of power to sign [NDAs]’.

The LSB identifies several scenarios where NDAs could be lawful but unethical: for example, where a vulnerable individual does not understand their full rights and responsibilities but signs to end a grievance process. NDAs may also ‘perpetuate systemic imbalances of power’, and may ‘indirectly encourage or at least facilitate further criminal or inappropriate acts by protecting an individual who goes on to commit them’.

Matthew Hill, LSB chief executive, said: ‘We want to make sure that regulation supports—and, where necessary, insists on—standards of conduct that ensure, as far as possible, that NDAs are never used to cover up wrongdoing, silence victims or deprive people unwittingly of their rights.

‘This is something everyone across the sector should be concerned about, and we want to work collaboratively to ensure NDAs—which have a legitimate and important role to play in a wide range of circumstances—are always used appropriately and ethically. We’re interested in hearing from anyone with a view on this topic—whether the real experience of people who have been subject to misuse of NDAs, practitioners in this or related fields, regulators, representative bodies and others—to help identify solutions that uphold public confidence.’

The call for evidence, which runs until 14 July, can be viewed on the LSB website here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll