header-logo header-logo

Courts empty for legal aid action

06 January 2014
Issue: 7589 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Criminal lawyers desert courts in protest over legal aid cuts

Criminal barristers and solicitors massed outside criminal courts across England and Wales today in a half-day of action against legal aid cuts—the Bar’s first walkout in its history.

Lawyers deserted Crown and Magistrates’ courts in droves, with many trials listed for the morning re-scheduled ahead of the protest.

The campaigners, many sporting full court attire of wigs and gowns, are calling for a re-think of Ministry of Justice (MoJ) plans to cut £220m a year from the criminal legal aid budget. They argue that the cuts will be unsustainable, and will increase the risk of miscarriages of justice.

Barristers and solicitors face a cut of about 17.5%—30% in their fees if the plans go ahead, while solicitors will be paid the same amount if their client pleads guilty or not, raising a conflict of interest.

Earnings at the criminal Bar vary widely, with many making less than £25,000.

James Welch, Liberty’s legal director, says the proposals “put the fairness of our criminal justice system in serious jeopardy”. 

In contrast with the robust action on display this week, the Law Society has controversially pursued a policy of engagement with the MoJ over legal aid, leading to it losing a vote of no confidence in its leadership 228 votes to 213 shortly before Christmas.

James Parry, partner at Liverpool firm Parry Welch Lacey, who led the campaign for the vote, says proposed fee cuts will make the majority of criminal defence work unviable, and two-thirds of criminal law firms could go out of business. Fees are to be cut by 17.5%, although Parry says the cuts will be worse in reality as there will be a flat fee of £321 for magistrates’ court trials.

However, Des Hudson, chief executive of the Law Society, defended its tactics, saying non-engagement “did not work”.

Issue: 7589 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll