header-logo header-logo

05 July 2023
Issue: 8032 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Technology
printer mail-detail

Court reform programme over budget & under-delivering

MPs have delivered a blistering verdict on the management of the issue-ridden court reform programme.

Publishing its ‘Progress on the courts and tribunals reform programme’ report last week, the Public Accounts Committee expressed serious concerns that HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has just £120m left of its total £1.3bn budget despite completing only 24 of 44 reform projects.

Following some timetable revisions, HMCTS now plans to deliver most reforms by March 2024. Its digital case-management system, Common Platform, is expected to complete in March 2025, more than a year behind schedule.

The committee highlighted numerous technical issues encountered during the roll-out of Common Platform, which created stress for court staff already coping with large backlogs of cases. It noted issues with some reformed services resulted in solicitors not receiving necessary notifications. Moreover, HMCTS had ‘not done enough to listen’ to court users’ concerns.

The committee’s chair, Dame Meg Hillier MP, said: ‘These are services crying out for critical reform, but frustratingly HMCTS’s attempts appear in some cases to be actively hindering its own staff’s ability to carry out their jobs.

‘HMCTS has now burnt through almost its entire budget for a programme of reform only a little over halfway complete.’

Nick Vineall KC, chair of the Bar Council, said the committee’s criticisms ‘echo the experiences we hear from barristers, especially in relation to Common Platform.

‘To date, the programme has not delivered on its promise of saving time and costs. In some cases, the introduction of Common Platform has slowed the system down, reducing court capacity.’

Law Society president Lubna Shuja said: ‘Feedback from our members has been that the speed of change and the number of changes all at once has been problematic.

‘Rolling out unfinished or untested software drives delays and costs, as we have seen with Common Platform.’

Issue: 8032 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Technology
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll