header-logo header-logo

05 February 2009
Issue: 7355 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Costs , Employment
printer mail-detail

Court fees to soar

Courts

Lawyers have hit out at plans to hike civil court fees.

The plans, which would more than triple fees for many magistrates’ and other civil court matters, are set out in the Ministry of Justice consultation paper, Civil Court Fees 2008.

The fee for service by bailiff of an order to attend court would rise from £30 to £100. The fee for filing a request for detailed assessment where the party is legally aided would increase from £105 to between £300 and £5,000, and the fee for applying for a charging order would rise from £55 to £100. Commencement of committal applications in existing proceedings would attract a fee of £250 rather than the current £90.

Paul Marsh, Law Society President, says: “Civil Court fees are in danger of becoming unreasonable and preventing access to justice.

“Such increases would be more palatable if there was a visible benefit as, despite fee increases, courts continue to be under resourced. This leads to delay and that in turn results in court users facing increased solicitor’s costs.”

In 2007/08, court fees raised £472m, 78% of the £607m cost of running the civil and family courts.

The Ministry of Justice document says the underlying goals of full-cost recovery and raising income are “not in question”.

Issue: 7355 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Costs , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll