header-logo header-logo

31 May 2018
Issue: 7795 / Categories: Legal News , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Court competition hots up

England & Wales working to stay ahead of global markets

London’s commercial courts are increasingly international, but competition from regional hubs remains fierce, according to an annual report.

The Commercial Courts Report 2018, commissioned by communications agency Portland, analyses the 158 judgments from the London commercial courts between March 2017 and April 2018. It found that 656 litigants from 69 countries were represented in the past year, up from 62 countries in 2015/16.

More than 40% (267 litigants) were from the UK. Kazakhstan accounted for 31 litigants, the second highest nationality in terms of representation. Russian and US litigants were the joint third most likely nationality to appear, with 20 litigants each. Next came, in order, Germany, UAE, Singapore, Turkey, Cyprus, Panama, India, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Switzerland and Jersey.

There was also a 22% increase in the total number of litigants using the commercial courts compared to 2017. However, London faces stiff competition from abroad, such as the Dubai International Financial Centre Courts (DIFC), the Qatar International Court (QIC), the Abu Dhabi Global Market Courts (ADGMC) and the Singapore International Commercial Court (SICC).

Charles Balmain, committee member of the London Solicitors Litigation Association (LSLA), and a partner at White & Case, said: ‘The English court system remains amongst the global elite, known worldwide for the high calibre of its Judges.

‘We are already seeing the English courts react to keep ahead of growing competition from other fora. In particular, we are seeing increased use of technology, and the trial of new, streamlined, disclosure processes aimed at balancing the benefit of this process with the time and cost involved. We are confident that such improvements will only heighten the popularity of England as a forum for dispute resolution and are delighted to see this reflected in the Commercial Courts Report 2018.’ 

Philip Hall, partner at Portland, said the London Commercial Courts are well placed but ‘cannot be complacent’.

Issue: 7795 / Categories: Legal News , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll