header-logo header-logo

13 January 2011
Issue: 7448 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Countryfile presenter suffered age discrimination

TV presenter Miriam O’Reilly has won her age discrimination claim against the BBC.

In O’Reilly v BBC, this week, London central employment tribunal found that O’Reilly, an award-winning presenter of Countryfile, suffered age discrimination when the BBC replaced her with a younger presenter when the programme moved to primetime. 

A combined claim of sex discrimination was not upheld. However the tribunal acknowledged that older women “faced particular disadvantage within the broadcast media”.

The tribunal further found that O’Reilly, aged 51 at the time, was victimised because her boss thought wrongly that she went to the press, and this led her to be dropped from Countryfile Magazine.

The tribunal found that “it would not be proportionate to do away with older presenters simply to pander to the assumed prejudice of some younger viewers”.

Camilla Palmer, partner at Leigh Day & Co, who represented O’Reilly, said: “This has huge implications for all broadcasters not just the BBC.

“The lesson is that presenters should be selected for their ability, not their age. Women and men on screen should not

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll