header-logo header-logo

16 June 2017
Issue: 7750 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Could Brexit negotiations stall?

Government could be forced to request a break in Brexit negotiations

The government could be forced to request a break in the Brexit negotiations if the relationship between the Conservatives and the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) sours, a constitutional expert has warned.

A ‘confidence and supply’ agreement between the two parties is currently being negotiated, amid mounting speculation that the Queen’s Speech, scheduled to take place on 19 June, may need to be postponed. Whether or not it is, the UK is due to begin its Brexit negotiations on the same day.

Writing in this week’s NLJ, Neil Parpworth, Leicester De Montfort Law School, says: ‘If this informal relationship falters and “significant doubt” emerges as to the government’s ability to command the confidence of the House of Commons, The Cabinet Manual is clear that restrictions on government activity will apply.

Since this would entail observing “discretion in initiating any action of a continuing or long-term character”, it would clearly affect the government’s ability to continue negotiating with the EU. Thus, although the clock continues to tick following the triggering of Article 50, it is possible that the UK government may be forced to request that it be stopped sometime before March 2019, especially if another general election becomes necessary.'

Meanwhile, David Lidington, MP for Aylesbury, has replaced Elizabeth Truss as Lord Chancellor, in the prime minister’s cabinet reshuffle. Truss becomes the new Chief Secretary to the Treasury, and will attend cabinet. Lidington was previously Leader of the Commons, and served as Europe minister under Prime Minister David Cameron. According to the website, They work for you , which lists MPs’ voting records, Lidington campaigned to remain in the EU and voted against same-sex marriage. He is in favour of repealing the Human Rights Act 1998, putting him on a potential collision course with groups representing lawyers.

Nevertheless, he received warm congratulations from both the Bar Council and Law Society. Lidington said he looked forward to ‘working with the Lord Chief Justice and his fellow judges in the months ahead, to ensure that justice is fairly administered and robustly defended’.

Issue: 7750 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll