header-logo header-logo

22 March 2018
Issue: 7786 / Categories: Legal News , Costs
printer mail-detail

Costs reforms post-Jackson to remain a priority

Civil costs reform will continue post-Jackson as a ‘very high priority’, the Master of the Rolls has said.

Lord Justice Jackson, architect of the far-reaching costs and case management reforms introduced in April 2013 by LASPO (the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012), retired this month.

Delivering the Conkerton Memorial Lecture in Liverpool last week, ‘Civil justice after Jackson’, however, Sir Terence Etherton MR took the opportunity to outline potential future reforms. Civil Justice Council (CJC) working parties are due to make recommendations late this year on fixed recoverable costs for clinical negligence claims valued up to £25,000, and in July on mandatory pre-action alternative dispute resolution. A third CJC working party is investigating whether more use could be made of before-the-event (BTE) legal insurance, he said.

Elsewhere, Lady Justice Gloster is chairing a working group on disclosure, the cost of which remains ‘disproportionately high’, Sir Terence said, and a two-year pilot of the group’s proposals may start in the spring.

However, the biggest justice reform will be digital, he said. The proposed single online court encompassing civil, family and tribunal claims with common procedural rules requires primary legislation, which the government has not brought forward.

‘What is now envisaged is that the separate jurisdictions will remain but be accessed via a single digital platform,’ he said. 

‘There is still to be a new rules committee for online court claims, the online procedure rules committee, whose purpose will be to formulate new rules specifically applicable to online dispute resolution, with an emphasis on simplicity of language appropriate for litigants-in-person and so far as possible common rules for all three jurisdictions.’

Issue: 7786 / Categories: Legal News , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll