header-logo header-logo

Costs protection for Dieselgate interveners

25 June 2025
Issue: 8122 / Categories: Legal News , Environment , Costs , Health & safety , Transport
printer mail-detail
The High Court has given two environmental health groups permission to apply to intervene in the Dieselgate litigation, and given them protection from costs

A major trial is scheduled for October to consider allegations that certain diesel vehicles manufactured by Mercedes-Benz, Renault, Nissan, Peugeot Citroën, and Ford were fitted with devices to artificially lower NOx levels during emissions testing.

ClientEarth and Mums for Lungs will also request access to redacted materials explaining the operation and impact of any alleged defeat devices in the vehicles.

Shazia Yamin, partner at Mishcon de Reya, acting for the two groups, said: ‘Securing this protection was important as without it, there was a significant risk that our clients would not be able to proceed with their applications, which are brought in the interests of the wider public and open justice.’

Issue: 8122 / Categories: Legal News , Environment , Costs , Health & safety , Transport
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dispute resolution team welcomes associate in London

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Special education needs and mental capacity expert joins as partner

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll