header-logo header-logo

Costs + ADR = CADR

23 July 2015 / Hannah Rawlins
Issue: 7662 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Profession , Costs , ADR
printer mail-detail

Hannah Rawlins introduces CADR—a welcome alternative to detailed assessment

Changes to the CPR and rising court fees have resulted in a growing need for alternative dispute resolution (ADR). Aside from the general expense and CPR challenges it is a common frustration that significant delays are experienced in engaging in the formal detailed assessment process. In that period paying parties are left with the uncertainty of not knowing what their actual exposure will be and receiving parties are left out of pocket. Meanwhile interest continues to accrue on outstanding costs in the absence of exactly judged payments on account. No surprise then that ADR has become a sophisticated offering in both the domestic and international legal markets and is now being replicated in the litigious costs industry.

CADR

CADR (Costs Alternative Dispute Resolution) has formed an alternative dispute resolution panel bringing together a number of costs luminaries and experts at every level. Panel members include two recently retired members of the costs

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll