header-logo header-logo

Costs

30 November 2012
Issue: 7540 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of Rawlinson and Hunter Trustees SA and others) v Central Criminal Court and another [2012] EWHC 3218 (Admin), [2012] All ER (D) 211 (Nov)

The court enjoyed a wide and generous discretion as to the award of costs. The Court of Appeal had declined to give guidance on the making of costs orders on an indemnity basis. An award of costs on an indemnity basis would only be appropriate where there was some conduct or circumstances which took the case out of the norm and in all relevant circumstances had to be taken into account. The abandonment of issues ought not to be discouraged by the award of indemnity costs where a concession was made.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll