header-logo header-logo

A costly mistake

28 October 2011 / Ian Pegram , Lista M Cannon
Issue: 7487 / Categories: Features , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Lista Cannon & Ian Pegram note the important lessons to emerge from the FSA’s recent activity

The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) issued its largest ever fine for financial crime systems and controls failures on 21 July 2011. The FSA fined Willis Limited, the UK arm of the world’s third largest insurance and reinsurance broker, £6.895m.

While the present action was pursued under the UK’s financial regulatory framework, the FSA’s reasoning provides important guidance to businesses in all sectors on how the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) may assess whether anti-bribery procedures are “adequate” for the purpose of the Bribery Act 2010 (BA 2010).

Background

The FSA examined Willis’s policies to counter the risks of corruption associated with making payments to overseas third parties who assisted Willis in winning business from overseas clients.

While the FSA acknowledged that Willis had in place a number of policies and procedures aimed at limiting and detecting corruption issues, it found that Willis had not taken reasonable care to establish and maintain effective anti-bribery systems

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll