header-logo header-logo

Costly benefits

14 August 2008 / Rachael Healey , Simon Henthorn
Issue: 7334 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Are employers finding it too expensive to employ and insure older workers? Simon Henthorn & Rachael Healey

Age discrimination has received recent publicity with the Heyday challenge taking the stage in the European Court of Justice. However, the legislation creates other problems for employers. This article deals with the issue of provision of insurance benefits to older employees, particularly permanent health insurance (PHI) and private medical insurance.

The Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/1031) (the Regulations) came into force on 1 October 2006, implementing the Framework Directive 2000/78/EC (the Directive). The Regulations provide that in employment and vocational training, it is unlawful to discriminate against workers on the grounds of age. Direct and indirect discrimination, victimisation, instructions to discriminate and harassment are all prohibited. The law covers workers of any age so both the young and old can claim protection.

Direct discrimination is less favourable treatment of a worker on the grounds of their age or apparent age—for instance a refusal to provide PHI cover only to workers over the age of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll