header-logo header-logo

The cost of Jackson

27 June 2012
Issue: 7520 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

ACL survey: “Jackson will increase costs disputes”

The number of costs disputes between solicitors and their clients will rise as a result of the Jackson reforms, costs lawyers have predicted.

As of next April, when the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) comes into force, success fees in “no-win, no-fee” cases will no longer be recoverable. Instead, clients will pay their own costs out of their damages and are therefore likely to take a keen interest in the amount of costs their solicitor racks up.

A survey of 137 members of the Association of Costs Lawyers (ACL), published this week, showed 69% thought solicitor-client disputes would rise as a result.

Nearly a third of costs lawyers surveyed thought the Jackson reforms would discourage people from bringing cases, while more than half thought they would discourage solicitors from taking less straightforward cases.

Four out of 10 believe fierce competition will drive down the level of success fees, while nearly a third think costs will become more proportionate, and 42% think they will tilt the playing field in favour of defendants.

The survey uncovered common mistakes and misunderstandings by solicitors when dealing with costs. Failing to keep thorough records was the main complaint, followed by “they think they can do it themselves”. Other complaints included using unqualified costs draftsmen and only calling costs lawyers in when things have gone wrong.

Iain Stark, chairman of the ACL, says: “It is inevitable that solicitor/own client disputes will re-emerge post-LASPO, while the judiciary is emphasising how central costs management will be in the future.

“The truth is that many solicitors have neither the time nor experience to maximise the recovery of their own costs, and this is only going to become more difficult post-Jackson.”

Issue: 7520 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll