header-logo header-logo

Cost benefit analysis

20 October 2016 / Kerry Underwood
Issue: 7721 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs , Budgeting
printer mail-detail

Costs orders: who pays & when, asks Kerry Underwood

    • Wasted costs orders in civil litigation—a rapidly developing area of law.

    Wasted costs orders can only be made against a representative, whereas non-party costs orders can be made against anyone, including a representative.

    In both cases the power derives from s 51 of the Senior Courts Act 1981. Sub-section (3) provides that “the court shall have full power to determine by whom and to what extent the costs are to be paid” and this covers the county court, High Court and the civil division of the Court of Appeal (s 51(1)).

    This piece deals with wasted costs orders in civil litigation (but there are similar sanctions in the criminal courts and in tribunals) and non-party costs orders.

    Wasted costs

    Wasted costs includes disallowing costs and ordering payment of costs (s 51(6)) and can be at the suit of the representative’s own client or the other side

    If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
    If you are already a subscriber sign in
    ...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

    MOVERS & SHAKERS

    Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

    Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

    London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

    Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

    Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

    Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

    NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

    NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

    Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

    NEWS
    Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
    Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
    Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
    In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
    Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
    back-to-top-scroll