header-logo header-logo

07 August 2013
Issue: 7572 / Categories: bribery , Legal News
printer mail-detail

Corruption in the courts

Survey shows one quarter of people in UK do not trust judiciary

“Astonishing” claims have been made of corruption in the UK courts.

One in five people using the courts last year said they or a household member paid a bribe in relation to that, and nearly one quarter of people in the UK believe the courts and judiciary are corrupt, according to anti-corruption group Transparency International’s Global Corruption Barometer 2013

The survey was conducted among 1,000 people in each of 107 countries.

Dr Lawrence McNamara, deputy director of the Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law, writing in this week’s NLJ, said the levels of public perception of corruption were “not out of kilter” with other common law countries, and could be explained by recent scandals in Parliament, the BBC and other institutions.

Among the respondents, 75 people had used the courts, of which 15 people reported paying a bribe, he said. Five of these people said the bribe was a thank you gift. Therefore, 10 people paid a bribe to a judge, court employee or lawyer for a cheaper or faster service.

That would translate to 13% of 3.78 million people using the civil and criminal courts and judiciary last year, or 490,000 people paying bribes, which would be “astonishing”, he said. Evidence of this is “scant”, however, which suggests it is “extremely unlikely”. 

McNamara said the “remarkable” findings did not mean bribery was commonplace in British courtrooms, but should not be ignored. “It should lead us towards robust monitoring and research which examines rigorously and in depth the possibility that corruption may occur in the administration of justice, as it does in other institutions.”

In 2009, CPS barrister Sarfraz Ibrahim was convicted of accepting a share of a £20,000 bribe to drop a case. The first successful prosecution under the Bribery Act 2010 was against Munir Patel, a clerk at Redbridge Crown Court. Research among the legal profession has also indicated corruption is an issue in the UK justice system.

Issue: 7572 / Categories: bribery , Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll