header-logo header-logo

CORPORATE FINANCE

30 March 2007
Issue: 7266 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Russell-Cooke Trust Co v Elliott [2007] All ER (D) 166 (Mar)

One of the essential characteristics of a floating charge, distinguishing it from a fixed charge, is the ability of the chargor to dispose of and deal with the charged asset, and, if necessary, to remove it from the security without first requiring the permission or consent of the chargee.

The nature of the agreement, rather than the labels assigned by the parties, falls to be considered. It is possible, in appropriate circumstances, that a legal charge, labelled and described as ‘floating’, is in reality a fixed charge, having regard to the totality of the documentation creating the charge and the rights and obligations arising from that documentation.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
back-to-top-scroll