header-logo header-logo

04 June 2025
Issue: 8119 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Artificial intelligence
printer mail-detail

Corporate counsel tighten purse strings

A higher proportion of legal work will be done in-house in the next five years, more than half (54%) of UK in-house counsel and a third (35%) of lawyers in private practice believe

However, the shift—attributed mainly to pressure on general counsel to reduce their costs—is not uniformly spread across all areas of legal spend, according to a Thomson Reuters report, ‘2025 State of the UK legal market’. Increased spend is expected on regulatory advice by 31% of corporates, on employment law advice by 10%, and on banking and finance by 12%.

Conversely, 5% of UK corporates expect to reduce their external spend on litigation and disputes.

Both general counsel (64%) and law firms (58%) expect more value-based billing in the next five years and less hourly billing. Four out of ten in-house lawyers also expressed excitement about generative artificial intelligence (GenAI).

John Shatwell, head of legal professionals Europe at Thomson Reuters, said: ‘Lawyers and clients alike are keenly aware that new GenAI tools will shift costs and increase productivity.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll