header-logo header-logo

27 January 2025
Issue: 8102 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Housing , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

Consultation on civil legal aid rates rise begins

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has opened its consultation on a £20m boost for housing and immigration legal aid practitioners.

Its paper, ‘Civil legal aid: towards a sustainable future’, published this week, proposes the first rise in civil legal aid fees in nearly 30 years. Overall spend will rise 24% for housing and 30% for asylum and immigration work—with the aim of increasing the availability of legal advice for those at risk of losing their home, asylum seekers, people with immigration issues and victims of modern slavery, trafficking and domestic abuse.

Individual lawyers will see their rates rise to a minimum £65.35 per hour (£69.30 in London) or there will be a 10% uplift, whichever is higher.

Justice minister Sarah Sackman KC, in her foreword to the paper, writes: ‘We are determined to nurse this critical sector back to health, rebuilding a legal aid system that is sustainable, effective and efficient.’

Law Society president Richard Atkinson said the investment would ‘positively impact the community by ensuring there is adequate representation for issues such as evictions and housing disrepair’. 

The eight-week consultation is available here and closes on 21 March.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll