header-logo header-logo

05 August 2020 / Simon Gledhill , Gemma Noble
Issue: 7898 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Conspiracy theories

25529
Chain, wheel or umbrella? Simon Gledhill & Gemma Noble highlight the importance of identifying common design in conspiracy cases

In brief

  • What is a conspiracy?
  • The structure of a conspiracy.
  • Chain, wheel and umbrella conspiracies.
  • The appeal in Johnson.

In the 1973 Court of Appeal case of R v Greenfield [1973] 1 WLR 1151, [1973] 3 All ER 1050 the then Lord Chief Justice observed: ‘Conspiracy charges have long been regarded with suspicion by English lawyers. The reasons lie partly in history and partly on procedural difficulties. There have been times in our history, as for example under Henry VIII and at the end of the eighteenth century and the beginning of the nineteenth when prosecutions for conspiracy were used by the Crown to stifle criticism and prevent agitation for religious, social and economic changes.’

Forty-seven years later, while concerns as to the conduct of Henry VII no longer feature prominently in criticisms of conspiracy indictments; procedural difficulties remain a constant difficulty. This was highlighted again by the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll