header-logo header-logo

22 March 2024 / Nick Barnard
Issue: 8064 / Categories: Features , Company , Commercial , Fraud
printer mail-detail

Consent & connivance: individual liability for company offences

164866
Nick Barnard considers a little-used opportunity for investigative agencies, which could soon come into fashion
  • Considers the doctrine of ‘consent and connivance’, by which individuals can be criminally liable for offences committed by their companies.
  • Explores how this doctrine interacts with the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 regime for corporate liability.

Much has been written on the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (ECCTA 2023) and the new routes through which companies can be held criminally liable for the conduct of certain individuals. This article looks through the opposite end of the telescope and considers the doctrine of ‘consent and connivance’—an established, although rarely utilised, means by which certain individuals can be held criminally liable for offences committed by their companies. It also considers how this doctrine interacts with the new regime for corporate liability under ECCTA 2023.

Parasitic provisions

The majority of substantive offences usually in scope during corporate crime investigations are complemented by parasitic provisions stating that, where an offence

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll