header-logo header-logo

Consent & connivance: individual liability for company offences

22 March 2024 / Nick Barnard
Issue: 8064 / Categories: Features , Company , Commercial , Fraud
printer mail-detail
164866
Nick Barnard considers a little-used opportunity for investigative agencies, which could soon come into fashion
  • Considers the doctrine of ‘consent and connivance’, by which individuals can be criminally liable for offences committed by their companies.
  • Explores how this doctrine interacts with the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 regime for corporate liability.

Much has been written on the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (ECCTA 2023) and the new routes through which companies can be held criminally liable for the conduct of certain individuals. This article looks through the opposite end of the telescope and considers the doctrine of ‘consent and connivance’—an established, although rarely utilised, means by which certain individuals can be held criminally liable for offences committed by their companies. It also considers how this doctrine interacts with the new regime for corporate liability under ECCTA 2023.

Parasitic provisions

The majority of substantive offences usually in scope during corporate crime investigations are complemented by parasitic provisions stating that, where an offence

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll