header-logo header-logo

Conflict resolved?

16 October 2014 / Rory Cochrane
Issue: 7626 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail
cochrane

Rory Cochrane provides an update on bribes, agents & principals

The Supreme Court has handed down its judgment in FHR European Ventures LLP and others v Cedar Capital Partners LLC [2014] UKSC 45, [2014] 4 All ER 79. The judgment finally resolves the much debated question (the subject of recent conflicting Court of Appeal authorities, and several forests’ worth of academic discussion) of whether a fiduciary (in this case a purchaser’s agent) holds a bribe or secret commission, received in breach of fiduciary obligation, on trust for the beneficiary.

Anticipation

The judgment has been keenly anticipated by a wide range of practitioners. It is of interest to commercial litigators in general, and of particular interest to fraud and insolvency lawyers. Employment lawyers will also be interested in its application in the context of bribed employees and agents.

In FHR European Ventures, the Supreme Court has stated that a fiduciary (in this case, a property purchaser’s agent) holds a bribe or secret commission received in breach of fiduciary obligation on trust for their beneficiary.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll