header-logo header-logo

02 September 2010
Issue: 7431 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Conflict of laws—Bankruptcy—Order of foreign bankruptcy court

Rubin and another v Eurofinance SA and others [2010] EWCA Civ 895, [2010] All ER (D) 358 (Jul)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division,Ward, Wilson LJJ and Henderson J, 30 July 2010

Foreign bankruptcy proceedings, including adversary proceedings, should be recognised as a foreign main proceeding in accordance with the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency as set out in Sch 1 to the Cross-Border Insolvency Regulations 2006. The appointment therein of the receivers as foreign representatives within the meaning of art 2(j) of the Model Law should be similarly recognised.

Tom Smith (instructed by Dundas & Wilson LLP) for the receivers. Marcus Staff (instructed by Brown Rudnick LLP) for the defendants.

The proceedings concerned The Consumers Trust (TCT) created in March 2002 in order to carry on a sales promotion scheme in the USA and Canada. The trust profitably operated a voucher scheme until subjected to consumer protection proceedings. The first respondent settlor appointed the applicants, as the receivers and managers of TCT, to institute New

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll