header-logo header-logo

13 November 2019
Issue: 7864 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Training & education
printer mail-detail

Concerns as SQE enters final run

The Junior Lawyers Division (JLD) has warned that the Solicitors Qualifying Exam (SQE) ‘poses significant risks to the standing and credibility (both domestically and internationally) of the solicitor qualification’.

In a letter to the Legal Services Board last week, outgoing JLD chair Amy Clowrey expressed ‘support, in principle’ of the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s decision to overhaul the current system and ‘develop a consistent centralised standard’. However, the JLD, which has about 70,000 members, has concerns about the structure of the SQE, and wants to see more consultation take place.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has said it will apply in summer 2020 to the Legal Services Board for final approval of the SQE, which would eventually replace the Legal Practice Course.

In a separate letter to the Welsh Language Commissioner, Clowrey offered to work with her to ensure the SQE is offered in Welsh. The Solicitors Regulation Authority had initially said it would offer a Welsh language version provided parity of standard between the two versions could be achieved and the cost was not exorbitant. The regulator said last month that it would be too expensive and disproportionate to offer a Welsh SQE.

Clowrey also wrote to the Justice Select Committee urging further scrutiny of the SQE, which is ‘by no means a foregone conclusion’. She cited concerns that the exam would ‘dilute the standard of the solicitor qualification in England and Wales (thus making it less appealing as the jurisdiction of choice post-Brexit)’, including excepts from the 2016 consultation responses of Clyde & Co, Linklaters and The Association of Law Teachers. She highlighted, in particular, fears that the multiple choice questions element of the SQE was too easy.

Switalskis associate Clowrey, whose practice specialises in abuse claims, stepped down as chair last week. The new chair is Charlotte Parkinson, litigation associate at Addleshaw Goddard.

Issue: 7864 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Training & education
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll