header-logo header-logo

03 December 2015
Issue: 7679 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Is compliance too complex?

Professionals claim compliance represents a risk to global business

Compliance has become so complex that compliance professionals fear it is putting global business at risk, a devastating report has revealed.

Compliance has become so elaborate that 78% of compliance professionals say it now represents a risk in itself, according to research among more than 200 compliance professionals by independent global risk consultancy The Risk Advisory Group. They professionals cited increased regulation as their top challenge in the next 12 months, followed by geopolitical events, in particular the EU referendum.

More than 80% felt compliance had become more complex in the past two years, nearly 70% felt more exposed to risk than they did two years ago, and less than one in five feel very confident in their team’s ability to adequately protect the business, according to the report, The Compliance Horizon.

Nearly 60% described their role as safeguarding their company’s reputation, and more than half cited fear of negative exposure as the main driver for compliance in their organisation.

They were also fairly pessimistic about the future. Less than a third of the professionals believe new talent coming into their industry has what it takes to succeed.

Frank Maher, partner at Legal Risk, says: “A decade ago we had not had the Third EU Money Laundering Directive, the Solicitors Regulation Authority had not been created, there were no compliance officers for legal practice (COLPs) nor compliance officers for finance and administration (COFAs), the reforms of the Legal Services Act 2007, including entity regulation, were merely under discussion and, although the data protection legislation has not changed in that time, its impact has been transformed.

“An example of the increased burden in data protection is the deluge of cyber-attacks on law firms which provides a daily test of their compliance in protecting the personal data of clients, their clients’ customers and their staff with potentially severe consequences if they are hacked. We have also seen a massive growth in the use of financial sanctions.

“For an increasing number of firms, matters are becoming more complex as they expand internationally, giving rise to complex issues of cross-border regulation.”

Issue: 7679 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll