header-logo header-logo

17 January 2014 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7590 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

A complex state of affairs

Jon Robins observes the fallout from the recent legal aid protests

It was handbags at dawn. The offending item being one Mulberry Bayswater handbag reportedly worth £1,100 and belonging to “a lady barrister”, as the Daily Mail delicately put it in its coverage of barristers protesting last week outside the Old Bailey.

The gathering was, according to the Mail , “the most privileged picket line ever”. “Some junior barristers earn as little as £13,000 a year, their leaders said” and so, the Mail sniped, “perhaps it was a mistake” to sport such a lavish accessory to a demo. All strikes have their hate-figures, reflected The Independent . “For the miners in 1984 it was Margaret Thatcher. For today’s barristers, the proposed cuts...have become the equivalent of pit closures.”

The standoff between the criminal defence profession and the government is a complex and convoluted state of affairs. It must be difficult for the public to make sense of last week’s walkout which was supported by thousands of solicitors as well as barristers.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll