header-logo header-logo

11 December 2024
Issue: 8098 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Complaints handling fails to impress

The Legal Ombudsman (LeO) has called for a ‘cultural shift’ in the way lawyers handle complaints.

LeO warned that complaints data for the 12 months up to the end of March 2024, published last week, shows no improvement in lawyers’ standards of customer service and complaints handling—with areas of failure not changing over time.

In total, LeO took on 6,652 complaints from people unhappy with the service they’d received from a legal provider, and resolved 7,918 complaints. One third of these related to residential conveyancing, with the next biggest areas being personal injury and wills and probate.

Overall, LeO found legal providers’ standard of service hadn’t been good enough in 69% of the cases it investigated. In residential conveyancing, personal injury, and wills and probate, there was evidence of poor service in three-quarters of cases.

Poor communication accounted for one in four of all complaints upheld, while one sixth were about legal providers’ delay and failure to progress legal matters.

Moreover, LeO found that lawyers’ in-house complaints handling hadn’t been good enough in nearly half (46%) of the complaints it investigated.

Chief ombudsman Paul McFadden said: ‘It’s good news that we’re able to sort out half of all complaints through early resolution. If something’s gone wrong, and a lawyer has offered to put things right fairly, we can explain that to their client.

‘But the fact is many of these complaints could have been prevented or resolved without us. And where we need to investigate in more depth, our data doesn’t paint a positive picture. It’s also disappointing we’re not seeing change or improvement in the types of issues consumers are raising.

‘Lawyers should welcome feedback from clients—including, and perhaps especially, about what’s not gone well. It’s clear a cultural shift is needed in lawyers’ approach to complaints – they’re opportunities to learn and do things better.’

Issue: 8098 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll