header-logo header-logo

Compensation Fund: levy to be tripled?

03 July 2024
Issue: 8078 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Compensation
printer mail-detail

The Law Society has hit out at Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) proposals to raise the Compensation Fund levy by 200% for individuals (from £30 to £90) and by 233% for firms (from £660 to £2,220)

Law Society chief executive officer Ian Jeffery said: ‘We have to question whether the SRA has provided sufficient evidence to justify the increases.’

He acknowledged pressures caused by the collapse of Axiom Ince, but he urged the SRA to explain what measures it was taking to minimise risk in the future.

The contribution levels were set out in the SRA’s 2024–25 business plan and budget, published last week. SRA chief executive Paul Philip said the rise ‘has been driven by an unprecedented level and cost of claims and interventions in the last year. We have done all we can.’

Issue: 8078 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Compensation
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll