header-logo header-logo

Compare & contrast (Pt 1)

23 January 2015 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 7637 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail
pampline

Chris Pamplin explains why new guidance should be required reading for all expert witnesses & those who instruct them

The long-awaited update to the 2007 Protocol for the Instruction of Experts to give Evidence in Civil Claims (written by the Civil Justice Council (CJC)) is with us at last. Renamed Guidance for the instruction of experts in civil claims, it leaves much of the original guidance in place but adds some new material in areas that have changed, or been introduced, since 2007. This short series works through the new guidance drawing out the key points for experts, providing a refresher on the guidance that has not changed, and an introduction to the areas that have.

  • References in the form (para 1) represent the paragraph number in the new guidance.
  • New material is in bold.

Purpose

The purpose of the guidance is now to allow litigants, experts and those who instruct them to “… understand best practice in complying with Part 35 and court orders”. In the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll